domingo, 29 de julho de 2007

The Age Of Einstein

The Age Of Einstein

He became, almost despite himself, the emblem of all that was new, original and unsettling in the modern age

BY ROGER ROSENBLATT

For Einstein to become a modern icon, especially in America, required a total revision of the definition of a hero. Anti-intellectualism has been as integral a part of American culture as the drive for universal education, and the fact that both have existed concurrently may account for the low status of teachers. In America it is not enough to be smart; one must compensate for one's intelligence by also showing the canniness and real-world power of the cowboy and the pioneer. Einstein did this. He was the first modern intellectual superstar, and he won his stardom in the only way that Americans could accept--by dint of intuitive, not scholarly, intelligence and by having his thought applied to practical things, such as rockets and atom bombs.

The recognition of the practical power of his ideas coincided with a time when such power was most needed. Einstein came to America in 1933 as the most celebrated of a distinguished group of European intellectuals, refugees from Hitler and Mussolini, who, as soon as they arrived, changed the composition of university faculties (largely from patrician to Jewish), and who also changed the composition of government. Until F.D.R.'s New Deal, the country had never associated the contemplative life with governmental action. Now there was a Brain Trust; being an "egghead" was useful, admirable, even sexy. One saw that it was possible to outthink the enemy. Einstein wrote a letter to Roosevelt urging the making of a uranium bomb, and soon a coterie of can-do intellectuals convened at Los Alamos to become the new cowboys of war machinery. Presidents have relied on eggheads ever since: Einstein begat Kissinger begat Rubin, Reich and Greenspan.

As for the appeal of his intuitive imagination, it helped that Einstein was initially not associated with a brand-name institution of higher learning and that his stature did not depend on official accreditation--both of which Americans at once insist on and do not trust. To the contrary: he was eagerly adopted by ordinary folks, though he spoke the obscure language of mathematics, because he seemed removed from snooty trappings. In fact, he seemed removed from the planet, to be out of things in the way the public often adores: a lovable dreamer.

So strong was the image he created that he affected both culture and politics in ways that were sometimes wholly opposite to his beliefs and intentions. That his theory of relativity was readily mistranslated as a justification for relativism says more about the way the world was already tending than about Einstein. His stature gave an underpinning to ideas that had nothing to do with his science or personal inclinations. The entire thrust of modern art, whether it took the form of Expressionism, Cubism, Fauvism or fantasy, was a conscious effort to rejigger the shapes of observable reality in the same spirit of liberation and experimentation that Einstein brought to science.

But relativism--that is, the idea that moral and ethical truth exists in the point of view of the beholder--owed nothing to Einstein (who believed the opposite), except a generalized homage to revolutionary thought. Art's elimination of semblances to the physical world corresponded vaguely with Einstein's way of seeing time and space, but it really sprung from an atmosphere of change, in which Einstein was yoked with Freud, Marx, Picasso, Bergson, Wittgenstein, Joyce, Kafka, Duchamp, Kandinsky and anyone else with original and disruptive ideas and an aggressive sense of the new. By that tenuous connection did the discoverer of relativity become a major figure of a world consisting of individuals interpreting the world individually. He was similarly associated with the pluralism of modern music and the eclecticism of modern architecture.

In literature, things were ready to fall apart on their own, so any excuse to do so--especially one as revered as a theoretical restructuring of the universe--was embraced. In 1919 relativity exploded upon science. In 1922 T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land had a similar effect on literature. Yet when Eliot wrote, "these fragments I have shored against my ruins," people took up the fragments but ignored the shoring.

The key, though, in Eliot and other 20th century poets and novelists, lay in the prominence of the pronoun I--the center of relativistic thought. Thus spake the confessional poetry of the 1960s, the memoirs in the 1980s and 1990s, the prominence of the narrator in all of modern fiction. A commonplace paradox that was soon to characterize fiction was that the antihero, who was beset and disempowered by modern bureaucracies and machines, was simultaneously exalted by his diminished status.

Relativism brought the underground man into his own--in Europe, with Dostoyevsky, Kafka, Beckett, Aichinger, Sartre, Mann and Pirandello; in America with Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Ellison, Capote and Salinger. The antihero, too, searched for unified meaning, but the narrative that held him was all about divisions, schisms and self-inspection. He sought to be by himself, like a god. In Robert Musil's The Man Without Qualities and Richard Wright's The Outsider, protagonists become serial killers out of the desire to be alone.

All this has nothing to do with relativity, but it had much to do with Einstein's contemplation of relativity. Einstein became the emblem not only of the desire to know the truth but also of the capacity to know the truth. In his 1993 novel, Einstein's Dreams, Alan Lightman writes, "In this world time is a visible dimension. Just as one may look off in the distance and see houses, trees, mountain peaks that are landmarks in space, so one may look out in another direction and see births, marriages, deaths that are signposts in time, stretching off dimly into the far future." It does not take much of another stretch to attach godhead to such a vision, though that was hardly Einstein's own feeling.

However interesting this view made art, what it did for politics was pure destruction. Paul Johnson connects relativism to the extreme nationalism of 20th century political movements in his generally persuasive view of Modern Times. The relationship he cites is sometimes elliptical. What one can say is that the destruction of absolutes--monarchies no less than Newtonian physics--created a vacuum, and in certain key places that vacuum was filled by maniacs and murderers.

There is a connection, though, between European Romanticism, which came into being at the tail end of the 18th century, and the totalitarian credos that bloomed like sudden deadly plants in the first third of the 20th. Einstein did not promote the image of man at the center of the cosmos, controlling the stars by thought. But, quite by accident, he was that image. Merely by being, he corroborated the Romantic view that people were 10 feet tall, capable of knowing heaven, and, in the Byronic mode, of speaking directly to God. The logical consequence of such "thinking" was that some people were more able to speak to God than were others, and that God, in turn, spoke to a selected few. Throw in social Darwinism, and by the time the 20th century was under way, Romanticism led directly to Dachau, Auschwitz, the Gulags, the hills of skulls in Cambodia and most recently the fields of graves in Bosnia.

To read Einstein's essays in Out of My Later Years is to see that he held none of the artistic or political ideas that were extrapolated from his work. Whatever revisions he made of Newton, he continued to side with his predecessor on the issue of causality. He abhorred chaos and revolution for its own sake. He was devoted to constancy as much as to relativity, and to the illogical and the senses. In the end, his most useful gift may be not that he pulled the world apart but that once that was done, he strove to put it back together.

"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility," he quoted Kant, and added that the fact that the world is comprehensible "is a miracle." He also understood his responsibility for the weapons he helped create. "We scientists," he wrote, "whose tragic destination has been to help in making the methods of annihilation more gruesome and more effective, must consider it our solemn and transcendent duty to do all in our power in preventing these weapons from being used."

Why, finally, is he so important to the age? Not because he personified brainpower--not because he was "an Einstein"--but rather because he demonstrated that the imagination is capable of coming to terms with experience. Simply by gazing into existence, he concluded that time and space could be warped, that mass and energy were interchangeable. He understood that the world was a puzzle created for deciphering and, more, that a person's place in the order of things was to solve as much of the puzzle as possible. This is what makes a human human; this, and the governing elements of morals and humor.

Einstein's friend and fellow physicist Abraham Pais called him "the freest man I have known," by which he meant that by the pure act of thinking, Einstein controlled his destiny. His mind was utterly fearless, and by its uses he diminished fear in others. "It stands to the everlasting credit of science," Einstein wrote, "that by acting on the human mind, it has overcome man's insecurity before himself and before nature." And so he became a model of what humans might do if they put their mind to it.

O tic-tac de Einstein

O tic-tac de Einstein



Para apreciarmos melhor algumas das incríveis conseqüências da teoria da

relatividade especial, devemos definir o que é um evento. Um evento é algo que

acontece, um ocorrência em algum local do espaço e em algum momento no

tempo, como, por exemplo, uma bola batendo no chão. O segundo postulado de

Einstein leva ao seguinte resultado surpreendente: a simultaneidade é relativa.

Dois eventos que são simultâneos para o observador A, como duas bolas

batendo no chão ao mesmo tempo, não serão simultâneos para um observador

B, movendo-se com velocidade constante em relação ao observador A.

Você não acredita? Pois bem, vamos voltar ao exemplo do trem em movimento. O observador A está de pé na

estação, e, como antes, o trem está se movendo na direção leste(-) com velocidade V em relação ao

observador A sentado exatamente no meio do trem está o observador B. De repente, o observador A vê dois

relâmpagos atingirem a frente e a traseira do trem exatamente ao mesmo tempo.( Não se preocupe, ninguém se

machuca num experimento mental.)


O observador A sabe que os relâmpagos atingiram o trem ao

mesmo tempo porque sua luz demora exatamente o mesmo tempo

para viajar até seus olhos. Portanto, os dois eventos serão

simultâneos para o observador A, mas será que são simultâneos

para o observador B? Bem, B está se movendo na direção leste

com velocidade V. Ele está se dirigindo em direção ao relâmpago

que atingiu a frente e se distanciando daquele que atingiu a traseira

do trem. Ele verá a luz do relâmpago que atingiu a frente ANTES

de ver a luz do relâmpago que atingiu a traseira. Portanto, para o

observador B, os eventos não são simultâneos. O que é

simultâneo para um, não é simultâneo para outro. Cada

observador tem seu tempo particular; dois observadores podem

calcular suas medidas se eles conhecerem sua velocidade relativa. Tempo absoluto simplesmente não

existe.

Existem duas outras conseqüências do segundo postulado de Einstein que contradizem o nosso bom senso. Eles

são conhecidos respectivamente, como DILATAÇÃO TEMPORAL e CONTAÇÃO ESPACIAL.

Basicamente, afirmam que um relógio em movimento bate mais lentamente que um relógio em repouso, e que

um bastão encolhe na direção de seu movimento. No limite em que o relógio e o bastão se movem com a

velocidade da luz, o tempo pára ( o intervalo entre o "tic" e o "tac" se torna infinitamente longo) e o bastão

desaparece. Perplexo? Primeiramente, tentarei convencê-lo que um relógio bate mais devagar.

Vamos voltar ao trem que está parado na estação. Um instrumento chamado "relógio de luz" foi posto no trem.

Este consiste em uma caixa transparente com dois espelhos idênticos postos frente a frente, um no chão outro

no teto. De algum modo, é possível fazer com que um pulso de luz viaje continuamente entre os dois espelhos,

sendo refletido de cima para baixo e de baixo para cima. Quando o pulso de luz bate no espelho inferior,

ouvimos um "tic", e quando o pulso bate no espelho superior, ouvimos um "tac". O intervalo de tempo entre um

tic e um tac chamamos de T0. Esse é o intervalo de tempo quando o relógio está em repouso. O trem inicia sua

viagem, passando pelo observador A, com velocidade constante V, que ouve um "tic" seguido de um "tac". Ele

chama o intervalo de tempo entre os dois de Tv. Quando ele compara as duas medidas ele percebe que Tv é

maior que T0: o intervalo de tempo entre um tic e um tac é maior para o relógio em movimento.

Vamos analisar o resultado. Como podemos ver na figura, o

trajeto percorrido pelo pulso de luz entre os dois espelho e é maior

do que quando ele está em repouso. Como a luz viaja sempre na

mesma velocidade (segundo postulado), o observador A, conclui

que quando em movimento um relógio bate mais devagar. Note,

que esse efeito é medido apenas para o observador A. Para o

observador B, sentado no trem em repouso em relação ao relógio,

o intervalo de tempo entre um tic e um tac é exatamente T0. A

dilatação temporal é um fenômeno que depende do movimento

relativo entre dois referenciais inerciais, no nosso caso, o trem e a

estação.

Esse resultado não depende do tipo de relógio que usamos em nosso experimento. Caso tivéssemos usado

nosso coração para marcar a passagem do tempo, os resultados teriam sido idênticos.

Finalmente, temos a contração espacial. Vamos repetir o experimento com o relógio de luz, mas agora com o

relógio posicionado na horizontal, de modo que os espelhos estejam na vertical. O observador A, na estação,

mede o intervalo de tempo entre um tic e um tac quando o relógio está em movimento com o trem. O

observador a mede o mesmo tempo que antes Tv. Entretanto, na presente situação, o pulso de luz tem de viajar

um distância mais longa, já que ele não só deve cobrir a distância entre os dois espelhos, mas também deve

"alcançar" o espelho que está se movendo para o leste (-). Como a luz viaja sempre com a mesma velocidade,

a única explicação é que a distância entre os dois espelhos encolheu, ou seja, d’é menor que d. Os objetos se

contraem na direção de seu movimento.

"Espere um momento!", você exclama, "se Einstein está certo, por

que nunca observamos objetos em movimento se contraindo,

relógios em movimento se atrasando, ou a relatividade da

simultaneidade?" A razão é que a velocidade da luz é tão maior do

que as velocidades ordinárias de nosso dia-a-dia que para nós

esses efeitos relativísticos são completamente desprezíveis.

Assim sendo, a teoria da relatividade especial relacionava o espaço

e o tempo de tal modo que é mais conveniente pensarmos nele

como sendo fundidos em um novo espaço quadridimensional, o

espaço-tempo (uma dimensão para o tempo e três para o espaço:

altura, largura e profundidade). Uma distância nesse espaço-tempo

engloba tanto distâncias espaciais como intervalos temporais.

As três conseqüências discutidas a cima são complementadas por mais uma, apresentada por Einstein num

terceiro manuscrito, também publicado em 1905. A massa é uma forma de energia, a famosa E=mc2.

E, mesmo que um objeto esteja em repouso, ele tem energia "armazenada" em sua massa m. Em movimento, o

objeto tem mais energia de que quando está em repouso. Einstein propôs que a massa de um objeto aumenta

com sua velocidade, atingindo um valor infinito à medida que ele se aproxima da velocidade da luz. Desse

modo, para acelerarmos um objeto até a velocidade da luz, é necessário uma quantidade infinita de energia. Em

outras palavras, nenhum objeto com extensão espacial pode atingir a velocidade da luz.

Leis de Newton

LEI DE NEWTON

No texto, todo e qualquer vetor é representado por uma letra em negrito. Nas

figuras, os vetores têm sua representação usual, ou seja, com uma seta em

cima.

Tópicos (nesta página)

1a Lei de Newton

2a Lei de Newton

3a Lei de Newton

...

Em 1642, alguns meses após a morte de Galileu Galilei, nascia Isaac

Newton. Aos 23 anos de idade, Newton havia desenvolvido suas

famosas leis do movimento, derrubando de vez as idéias de

Aristóteles que dominaram as grandes mentes por 2000 anos.

A primeira lei é o estabelecimento do conceito de inércia, proposto

antes por Galileu. A segunda lei relaciona a aceleração à sua causa, a

força. A terceira lei é a bem conhecida 'Lei da Ação e Reação'. Essas

três leis apareceram em um dos mais importantes livros: o

PRINCIPIA de Newton.

...

...

A 1a Lei de Newton

Até o início do século XVII, pensava-se que para se manter um corpo em movimento era necessária uma força atuando

sobre ele. Essa idéia foi totalmente revirada por Galileu, que afirmou: "Na ausência de uma força, um objeto continuará

se movendo em linha reta e com velocidade constante".

Galileu chamou de Inércia a tendência que os corpos apresentam de resistir à uma mudança em seu movimento.

Alguns anos mais tarde, Newton refinou a idéia de Galileu e a tornou sua primeira lei, também conhecida como Lei da

Inércia:

"Todo corpo continua em repouso ou em movimento retilíneo e uniforme, a menos

que uma força atue sobre ele".

Assim, se ele está em repouso continuará em repouso; se estiver em movimento, continuará se movendo em linha reta e

com velocidade constante.

Veja alguns exemplos:

Quando a força acelera o cartão, a moeda cai no copo.

Quando o cavalo freia subitamente, a pessoa é

arremessada.

Veja o exemplo da pessoa cavalgando. Quando o cavalo pára subitamente, a pessoa que estava em movimento tende a

continuar seu movimento, sendo lançada para frente. Este exemplo também ilustra a importância do uso do cinto de

segurança em um automóvel. Seu corpo está solto dentro do automóvel, assim qualquer movimento brusco, como em

uma batida, onde o automóvel irá parar subitamente, seu corpo será lançado, tendendo a continuar o movimento que

possuía antes. O cinto é a maneira de prender seu corpo ao banco do carro.

Já no exemplo da esquerda, você coloca um pedaço de cartolina sobre um copo, e sobre a cartolina uma pequena moeda.

Quando você dá um forte 'peteleco' na cartolina, pode ver que a moeda cai dentro do copo. Com o que foi aprendido,

pode dizer por quê isso acontece?

...

2a Lei de Newton

A primeira lei explica o que acontece com um corpo quando a resultante (soma vetorial) de todas as forças externas que

atuam sobre ele é zero: o corpo pode tanto permanecer em repouso quanto continuar movendo-se em linha reta com

velocidade constante. A segunda lei explica o que acontece com um corpo quando aquela resultante não é zero.

Imagine que você está empurrando um caixa sobre uma superfície lisa (pode-se desprezar a influência de qualquer

atrito). Quando você exerce uma certa força horizontal F, a caixa adquire uma aceleração a. Se você aplicar uma força 2

vezes maior, a aceleração da caixa também será 2 vezes maior e assim por diante. Ou seja,

a aceleração de um corpo é diretamente proporcional à força resultante que atua sobre ele.

Entretanto, a aceleração de um corpo também depende da sua massa. Imagine, como no exemplo anterior, que você

aplica a mesma força F em um corpo com massa 2 vezes maior. A aceleração produzida será, então, a/2. Se a massa for

triplicada, a mesma força aplicada irá produzir uma aceleração a/3. E assim por diante. De acordo com esta observação,

conclui-se que:

a aceleração de um objeto é inversamente proporcional à sua massa.

Essas observações formam a 2a Lei de Newton:

A aceleração de um corpo é diretamente proporcional à força resultante que atua

sobre ele, e é inversamente proporcional à sua massa.

Veja as ilustrações abaixo:

...

1. A força da mão acelera a

caixa;

1. A força da mão acelera a

caixa;

2. Duas vezes a força

produz uma aceleração duas

vezes maior;

2. A mesma força sobre uma

massa duas vezes maior,

causa metade da aceleração;

3. Duas vezes a força sobre

uma massa duas vezes

maior, produz a mesma

aceleração original.

3. Sobre uma massa três

vezes maior, causa um terço

da aceleração original.

...

Essa lei pode ser expressa matematicamente como:

Quando a massa é dada em Kg e a aceleração, em m/s2, a unidade de força será kg.m/s2, chamada de Newton (N).

...

A 3a Lei de Newton

A terceira lei estabelece que, quando dois corpos interagem, a força que o corpo 1 exerce sobre o corpo 2 é igual e

oposta à força que o corpo 2 exerce sobre o corpo 1:

F12 = - F21

(Repare que a expressão acima é vetorial. Ou seja o vetor F12 é igual a menos o vetor F21).

Esta lei é equivalente a dizer que as forças semrpe ocorrem em pares, ou que uma única força isolada não pode existir.

Neste par de forças, uma é chamada de ação, e a outra, de reação.

A forças de ação e reação são iguais em intensidade (módulo) e direção, mas possuem sentidos opostos. E sempre

atuam em corpos diferentes, assim nunca se anulam.

Como exemplo, imagine um corpo em queda livre. O peso (P = m × g) deste corpo é a força exercida pela Terra sobre ele.

A reação à esta força é a força que o corpo exerce sobre a Terra, P' = - P. A força de reação, P', deve acelerar a Terra em

direção ao corpo, assim como a força de ação, P, acelera o corpo em direção à Terra. Entretanto, como a Terra possui

uma massa muito superior à do corpo, sua aceleração é muito inferior àquela do corpo (veja a 2a Lei).

Einstein pensa no Universo

Einstein pensa no Universo

"Ainda acredito na possibilidade de construirmos um modelo da realidade" Albert Einstein

Juntamente com a revolução na nossa compreensão da física do muito veloz e

do muito pequeno, as três primeiras décadas do século XX presenciaram um

outra revolução: uma nova física da gravidade e do Universo como um todo;

ou seja, um física do muito grande. Mais uma vez o estímulo intelectual

crucial veio da mente de Einstein. Logo após ter completado seu trabalho em

relatividade especial, Einstein se perguntou como seria possível incluir

também observadores movendo-se com velocidades variáveis. Numa visão

que ele considerou "o pensamento mais fortuito de minha vida", Einstein

descobriu uma profunda conexão entre movimento acelerado e gravidade: uma teoria "geral" da

relatividade, capaz de incorporar movimentos acelerados, necessariamente implicava uma nova teoria

da gravidade.

Do mesmo modo que a relatividade especial revelara as limitações da mecânica newtoniana na descrição de

movimentos com velocidades comparáveis à velocidade da luz, a nova teoria da gravitação desenvolvida por

Einstein revelou as limitações da teoria de gravitação newtoniana. Tal como o eletromagnetismo, os efeitos da

gravidade também poderiam ser representados por campos. Uma massa tem um campo gravitacional

associado, "um distúrbio no espaço" que influenciará outras massas colocadas em sua vizinhança. Para sua nova

teoria de relatividade geral, Einstein teve de desenvolver uma estrutura conceitual radicalmente diferente, que

combinou de modo belíssimos conceitos físicos e matemáticos.

Ao invés de espaço e tempo absolutos, na relatividade geral o espaço-tempo se torna plástico, deformável: a

presença de matéria altera a geometria do espaço e o fluxo de tempo.

Em 1907, enquanto trabalhava no escritório de patentes em Berna, Einstein, escrevendo um artigo sobre a sua

teoria de relatividade especial, se deu conta que as leis físicas não podem ser diferentes para observadores com

movimentos relativos acelerados. As leis da relatividade deveria incluir todos os tipos de movimento, acelerado

ou não. Foi então que ele teve sua visão:

"Eu estava calmamente sentado numa cadeira no escritório de patentes em Berna quando, de repente,

um pensamento me ocorreu: em queda livre, um pessoa não sente seu próprio peso. Eu fiquei chocado.

Esse simples pensamento causou uma profunda impressão em mim. Ele me conduziu em direção à

novateoria da gravitação."

Para compreendermos a importância dessa visão, devemos voltar um pouco atrás. Uma das grandes

descobertas de Galileu foi que todos os objetos caem com mesma aceleração, independentemente de suas

massas. Largadas da mesma altura, uma bala de canhão e uma pena (na ausência de ar!) tocarão o chao ao

mesmo tempo.

Agora imagine que ao invés de um pena, fizéssemos este experimento com você! O que você verá durante a

queda? Fora que o chão se aproxima rapidamente, você verá a bala de canhão caindo junto a você, lado a

lado. De fato, se você não pudesse olhar para os lados, você não poderia dizer se você está ou não caindo;

você não sentiria nem mesmo o próprio peso. Você não acredita? Pois então, vamos a um experimento menos

drástico. Imagine-se num elevador, descendo rapidamente de uma altura de cinqüenta andares. Assim que o

elevador começa a descer você se sente mais leve. Quanto mais rapidamente o elevador descer, mais leve

você se sentirá. Se o elevador simplesmente cair, você não sentira seu próprio peso. Você e tudo mais no

elevador estarão em queda livre, flutuando livremente.

Essa visão fez com que Einstein compreendesse que os efeitos da gravidade poderiam ser "cancelados" num

sistema referencial adequado. Por exemplo, no interior do elevador em queda livre, não existe gravidade, e,

portanto, não existe aceleração. Em outras palavras, em um elevador em queda livres, os princípios da

relatividade especial são perfeitamente válidos.

A visão também disse algo mais a Einstein igualmente importante: para um observador numa cabine, sem

contado com o mundo exterior, seria impossível distinguir entre a aceleração causada pela gravidade e a

aceleração causada por qualquer outra força. Imagine-se que você foi posto numa cabine fechada e lançada ao

espaço interestelar. A cabine está sendo puxada por um foguete com aceleração igual a da Terra. De repente

uma voz vinda de um auto-falante ordena que você pegue duas bolas no armário, uma de madeira, outra de

aço. "Largue-as simultaneamente de um altura de um metro", diz "a Voz". Ao largar as duas bolas você percebe

que elas caem ao mesmo tempo. Inexplicavelmente você dispõe de um equipamento de medida de alta

precisão, e mede o tempo de queda de ambas as bolas.

Então, a Voz pergunta: "Usando apenas seus dados, será que você

descobre onde está?". Lembrando-se um pouco de suas aulas de

física, você sabe calcular a aceleração das bolas, e conclui que esta é a

mesma aceleração medida na superfície da Terra. Você responde à

Voz: "É claro, como eu medi um aceleração igual a da Terra, devo

estar na Terra". "Seu tolo" diz a Voz. Ao dizer isto, as paredes da

cabine se retraem, revelando um sistema de paredes, feitas de um

cristal transparente. Assim, você se depara que está em pleno espaço.

Raciocinado um pouco, você chega a conclusão que a aceleração do

foguete pode simular os mesmos efeitos da força gravitacional. Imagine

um elevador subindo; a aceleração extra do elevador faz com que

você se sinta mais pesado, ou seja ele aumenta a força gravitacional

que você sente. O mesmo acontece com a espaçonave puxando a

cabine. Essa é a conseqüência da terceira lei de Newton, a lei da ação

e reação.

Você conclui que, na prática, é impossível distinguir uma aceleração

para cima de uma força gravitacional para baixo. Esse resultado é

conhecido como o princípio da equivalência. Qualquer campo

gravitacional pode ser simulado por um referencial acelerado. Agora

podemos entender por que Einstein ficou tão empolgado com sua visão: uma teoria geral da relatividade capaz

de incluir movimentos acelerados é necessariamente uma teoria do campo gravitacional.

Agora imagine que em outra espaçonave esteja um amigo seu. Como antes, ambas as cabines têm paredes

transparentes e seriam puxadas lado a lado, independente uma da outra. Porém, enquanto a sua cabine seria

puxada com aceleração constante, a de seu amigo viajaria com velocidade constante. Assim, no momento que

você executa os experimentos, seus amigos os observam do ponto de vista de um referencial inercial

(velocidade constante).

O primeiro experimento é simples. As duas espaçonaves viajam lado a lado com velocidade constante. Então,

"a Voz" pede para que você joga uma bola na direção horizontal com velocidade constante e observe sua

trajetória comparando sua observações com seu amigo. Assim que você joga a bola, sua espaçonave começa a

acelerar para cima. Portanto, mesmo que você e a cabine sofram uma aceleração para cima, a bola, que não

estava mais em contato com você, não sofre nenhuma aceleração. Enquanto seu amigo vê a bola viajar com

velocidade constante em linha reta, você vê a percorrer uma trajetória curva. Esse resultado não o surpreende

muito, já que você sabia que um referencial acelerado pode simular um campo gravitacional.

Para a segunda parte do experimento, em vez de jogar

uma bola, você tem que disparar um raio laser,

sempre na direção horizontal em relação ao chão da

cabine. Para esse experimento a espaçonave irá impor

uma aceleração muito maior sobre a cabine, de modo

a simular um campo gravitacional bem forte. Claro,

graças a uma tecnologia desconhecida, você

permanecerá perfeitamente imune aos efeitos

extremamente desconfortáveis causadas por tais

acelerações, como, transformá-lo em uma panqueca!

Digamos que, você possa ver a trajetória do laser

através de uma neblina bem densa que há na cabine,

por razões desconhecidas. Tal como a bola, seu

amigo vê o laser percorrer uma trajetória retilínea. E

exatamente como a bola, você vê o raio laser

curvar-se para baixo. Você mal acredita em seus próprios olhos. A conclusão desse experimento é incrível; já

que um referencial acelerado simula um campo gravitacional, um raio luminoso pode ser curvado por uma

campo gravitacional! Esse efeito é uma conseqüência do princípio da equivalência.

Daí podemos, seguindo o mesmo raciocínio, explicar a existência de um buraco negro. Os Buracos Negros são

criados a partir da morte de uma estrela gigante. As estrelas morrem em grandes explosões que jogam suas

partes externas para o espaço e esmagam suas partes internas. Se a massa da estrela for maior que três vezes a

do Sol, a morte da estrela dará origem a um Buraco Negro, no seu centro a força gravitacional será tão intensa,

devido a grande densidade, que nem a luz poderá escapar, por isso o seu nome. Assim, seus raios luminosos,

encurvados sobre si mesmos, "cairiam" novamente sobre a própria estrela.

Os buracos negros são detectados pelos efeitos que causam em outros

corpos. Esta ilustração mostra um buraco negro sugando gases duma

estrela (representação artística de um buraco negro - no retângulo menor -

e sua ampliacão).

Entretanto, Mais tarde Einstein notou que existe outro modo de interpretar

esse fenômeno: em vez de afirmarmos que o campo gravitacional defletiu o

raio luminoso, podemos igualmente afirmar que o raio seguiu uma trajetória

curva por que o próprio espaço era curvo! A trajetória curva é o caminho

mais curto possível nessa geometria espacial deformada. Afinal, a luz

sempre toma o caminho mais curto possível entre dois pontos. Logo,

concluímos que a matéria dita a geometria do espaço e o espaço dita a

geometria da matéria.

De fato, a formulação da teoria da relatividade geral ocupou Einstein durante oito anos, até que chegasse a sua

forma definitiva em 1915. Todavia os esforços de Einstein foram recompensados: a teoria da relatividade geral

é um dos maiores feitos do intelecto humano.

Einstein e a Energia Nuclear

Einstein e a Energia Nuclear

Apresentaremos aqui , trecho de cartas enviadas por Einstein à Roosevelt (presidente dos USA)

Albert Einstein

Old Grove Road

Nassau Point

Peconic , Long Island

2 de agosto de 1939

F.D: Roosevelt

Presidente dos Estados Unidos da América

Casa Branca

Washington, D.C.

Senhor ,

Os recentes trabalhos de Fermi e Szilard , cujos manuscritos recebi ,

levam a pensar que o Urânio poderá talvez , em futuro próximo ,

tornar-se uma fonte de energia importante . Alguns aspectos dessa

situação exigem bastante cautela e é preciso que o governo tome

providências , se possível , rápidas . Por isso considerei meu dever

submeter à sua atenção as recomendações e os fatos seguintes :

No decorrer desse último trimestre , os trabalhos de Joliot na França ,

e de Fermi e Szilard , nos EUA , determinaram que será possível , em

futuro próximo , provocar uma reação nuclear em cadeia a partir de

uma massa significativa de urânio , reação que será capaz de liberar

grandes quantidades de energia [......]

Pode também acontecer que o domínio desse novo fenômeno abra

caminho - ainda que no momento não se tenha tanta certeza - à

fabricação de bombas de concepção inteiramente nova . A explosão

de uma só dessas bombas , transportada de navio até o interior de um

porto , seria suficiente para destruir todo o porto e o território a sua

volta . Quanto ao acesso por via aérea , é de se supor que essas bombas sejam , por enquanto , pesadas

demais para se pensar nessa possibilidade .

Levando em conta essa situação , talvez lhe pareça aconselhável cuidar para que um contato permanente

seja mantido entre a administração americana e o pequeno grupo de físicos que trabalham , nos EUA ,

nesse projeto de reação em cadeia . [ ....... ]

Tomei conhecimento de que a Alemanha suspendeu suas exportações de urânio . A rapidez com que essa

medida foi tomada explica-se , sem dúvida , através do fato de que o próprio filho de von Weizsacker,

subsecretário de estado da Alemanha , é ligado ao Instituto de Imperador Guilherme , em Berlim , onde se

retomam presentemente alguns trabalhos sobre urânio desenvolvidos nos Estados Unidos .

7 de março de 1940

F.D: Roosevelt

Presidente dos Estados Unidos da América

Casa Branca

Washington , D.C.

[.....] Quando , no decorrer do ano passado , atentei para o fato de que a pesquisa realizada com o urânio

podia ter consequências de alcance internacional , julguei ser meu dever informar o governo . Na ocasião ,

também mencionei que von Weizsacker , filho do secretário alemão , trabalhava em colaboração com um

grupo de químicos do Instituto do Imperador Guilherme , sobre a questão do urânio .

O interesse dos cientistas alemães pelo urânio aumentou desde o início da guerra . [ ..... ]

Reproduziremos agora , trechos do livro O Poder Nu , de Albert Einstein

[.....] não me considero o pai da energia atômica . Tive apenas uma participação indireta na descoberta desse

fenômeno . A bem dizer, não pensei sequer que viveria para ver esse princípio posto em prática . Pensava apenas

que a liberação de enrgia atômica seria teoricamente possível . Só quando foi descoberto, por acaso , o princípio

da reação em cadeia , é que as coisas parecem ter se precipitado . [ ......]

Não posso predizer quando terá início uma exploração da energia atômica para fins pacíficos e

construtivos. Tudo o que sabemos hoje é como utilizar uma quantidade relativamente grande de urânio.

Quanto à utilização de quantidades mínimas desse minério para fazer funcionar o motor de um carro ou

de um avião , por enquanto sua possibilidade está excluída e ninguém sabe ainda quando se poderá

pensar nisso . Sem dúvida , chegaremos lá um dia , mas quando ? Só Deus sabe . Ninguém sabe

tampouco quando outros materiais além do urânio , materiais mais comuns , poderão ser usados para

liberar energia atômica. É provável que tais materiais estejam entre os elementos mais pesados , que

possuem grande massa atômica e que deverão ser relativamente raros , por conta de sua instabilidade

.É possível que a maioria deles já tenha desaparecido , por desintegração radioativa . Por essa razão ,

mesmo que a liberação de energia atômica torne-se no futuro uma das mais importantes descobertas de

toda história da humanidade , pode acontecer que não venhamos ainda a experimentar seus efeitos

benéficos , nem hoje , nem mesmo amanhã.

Se não acredito que a energia atômica possa tão cedo trazer todos os seus benefícios à humanidade ,

acredito , pelo contrário , que ela constitui hoje uma ameaça . Talvez seja melhor assim: é um bom meio

de intimidar os homens e força-los a pôr finalmente um pouco de ordem nos assuntos internacionais ,

coisa que ainda parecem longe de poder fazer espontaneamente .[ ...... ]

Em 10 de dezembro de 1945 , durante um jantar oferecido para a entrega do prêmio Nobel , Einstein

pronunciou o discurso seguinte :

Os físicos de hoje estão numa situação que lembra a de Alfred Nobel . Nobel inventou um explosivo

mais poderoso que tudo o que se conhecia , um meio de destruição que parecia , na época , diabólico .

Foi para expiar essa descoberta e aliviar sua consciência, que ele instituiu em favor da paz ,o prêmio

que hoje tem seu nome. Os físicos que nesses últimos anos participaram da fabricação da arma mais

temível jamais inventada , carregam sentimento igual de responsabilidade , para não dizer culpa .

Como cientistas , o que fizermos será pouco para alertar o público diante de tais armas . Não tenho o

direito de relaxar os esforços que temos feito para conscientizar os povos do mundo inteiro , e mais

ainda seus governantes , do desastre indizível que provocarão com certeza , se não se decidirem a

mudar de atitude , uns com relação aos outros , e se não reconhecerem a responsabilidade que lhes

incumbe de preparar um futuro mais seguro . Fizemos de tudo para sermos os primeiros a possuir esse

tipo de arma , para que não se servissem dela os inimigos da humanidade . Conhecemos as intenções

dos nazistas e , sem esforço , podemos imaginar a que nível de destruição eles teriam chegado se

tivessem em seu poder a arma atômica , sem falar da submissão que teriam conseguido impor aos

povos do mundo inteiro com uma arma assim . Essa arma , quisemos que fosse entregue nas mãos das

nações americana e britânica , que souberam lutar pela paz e pela liberdade . Mas a constituição das

Nações Unidas até agora não trouxe a garantia de paz e liberdade que parecia , no entanto, prometer

. Nós ganhamos a guerra , mas ainda não a paz .

A Brief History of Relativity

A Brief History of Relativity

What is it? How does it work? Why does it change everything? An easy primer by the world's most famous living physicist

BY STEPHEN HAWKING

Toward the end of the 19th century scientists believed they were close to a complete description of the universe. They imagined that space was filled everywhere by a continuous medium called the ether. Light rays and radio signals were waves in this ether just as sound is pressure waves in air. All that was needed to complete the theory was careful measurements of the elastic properties of the ether; once they had those nailed down, everything else would fall into place.

Soon, however, discrepancies with the idea of an all-pervading ether began to appear. You would expect light to travel at a fixed speed through the ether. So if you were traveling in the same direction as the light, you would expect that its speed would appear to be lower, and if you were traveling in the opposite direction to the light, that its speed would appear to be higher. Yet a series of experiments failed to find any evidence for differences in speed due to motion through the ether.

The most careful and accurate of these experiments was carried out by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at the Case Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1887. They compared the speed of light in two beams at right angles to each other. As the earth rotates on its axis and orbits the sun, they reasoned, it will move through the ether, and the speed of light in these two beams should diverge. But Michelson and Morley found no daily or yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you were moving.

The Irish physicist George FitzGerald and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz were the first to suggest that bodies moving through the ether would contract and that clocks would slow. This shrinking and slowing would be such that everyone would measure the same speed for light no matter how they were moving with respect to the ether, which FitzGerald and Lorentz regarded as a real substance.

But it was a young clerk named Albert Einstein, working in the Swiss Patent Office in Bern, who cut through the ether and solved the speed-of-light problem once and for all. In June 1905 he wrote one of three papers that would establish him as one of the world's leading scientists--and in the process start two conceptual revolutions that changed our understanding of time, space and reality.

In that 1905 paper, Einstein pointed out that because you could not detect whether or not you were moving through the ether, the whole notion of an ether was redundant. Instead, Einstein started from the postulate that the laws of science should appear the same to all freely moving observers. In particular, observers should all measure the same speed for light, no matter how they were moving.

This required abandoning the idea that there is a universal quantity called time that all clocks measure. Instead, everyone would have his own personal time. The clocks of two people would agree if they were at rest with respect to each other but not if they were moving. This has been confirmed by a number of experiments, including one in which an extremely accurate timepiece was flown around the world and then compared with one that had stayed in place. If you wanted to live longer, you could keep flying to the east so the speed of the plane added to the earth's rotation. However, the tiny fraction of a second you gained would be more than offset by eating airline meals.

Einstein's postulate that the laws of nature should appear the same to all freely moving observers was the foundation of the theory of relativity, so called because it implies that only relative motion is important. Its beauty and simplicity were convincing to many scientists and philosophers. But there remained a lot of opposition. Einstein had overthrown two of the Absolutes (with a capital A) of 19th century science: Absolute Rest as represented by the ether, and Absolute or Universal Time that all clocks would measure. Did this imply, people asked, that there were no absolute moral standards, that everything was relative?

This unease continued through the 1920s and '30s. When Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921, the citation was for important--but by Einstein's standards comparatively minor--work also carried out in 1905. There was no mention of relativity, which was considered too controversial. I still get two or three letters a week telling me Einstein was wrong. Nevertheless, the theory of relativity is now completely accepted by the scientific community, and its predictions have been verified in countless applications.

A very important consequence of relativity is the relation between mass and energy. Einstein's postulate that the speed of light should appear the same to everyone implied that nothing could be moving faster than light. What happens is that as energy is used to accelerate a particle or a spaceship, the object's mass increases, making it harder to accelerate any more. To accelerate the particle to the speed of light is impossible because it would take an infinite amount of energy. The equivalence of mass and energy is summed up in Einstein's famous equation E=mc2, probably the only physics equation to have recognition on the street.

Among the consequences of this law is that if the nucleus of a uranium atom fissions (splits) into two nuclei with slightly less total mass, a tremendous amount of energy is released. In 1939, with World War II looming, a group of scientists who realized the implications of this persuaded Einstein to overcome his pacifist scruples and write a letter to President Roosevelt urging the U.S. to start a program of nuclear research. This led to the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb that exploded over Hiroshima in 1945. Some people blame the atom bomb on Einstein because he discovered the relation between mass and energy. But that's like blaming Newton for the gravity that causes airplanes to crash. Einstein took no part in the Manhattan Project and was horrified by the explosion.

Although the theory of relativity fit well with the laws that govern electricity and magnetism, it wasn't compatible with Newton's law of gravity. This law said that if you changed the distribution of matter in one region of space, the change in the gravitational field would be felt instantaneously everywhere else in the universe. Not only would this mean you could send signals faster than light (something that was forbidden by relativity), but it also required the Absolute or Universal Time that relativity had abolished in favor of personal or relativistic time.

Einstein was aware of this difficulty in 1907, while he was still at the patent office in Bern, but didn't begin to think seriously about the problem until he was at the German University in Prague in 1911. He realized that there is a close relationship between acceleration and a gravitational field. Someone in a closed box cannot tell whether he is sitting at rest in the earth's gravitational field or being accelerated by a rocket in free space. (This being before the age of Star Trek, Einstein thought of people in elevators rather than spaceships. But you cannot accelerate or fall freely very far in an elevator before disaster strikes.)

If the earth were flat, one could equally well say that the apple fell on Newton's head because of gravity or that Newton's head hit the apple because he and the surface of the earth were accelerating upward. This equivalence between acceleration and gravity didn't seem to work for a round earth, however; people on the other side of the world would have to be accelerating in the opposite direction but staying at a constant distance from us.

On his return to Zurich in 1912 Einstein had a brainstorm. He realized that the equivalence of gravity and acceleration could work if there was some give-and-take in the geometry of reality. What if space-time--an entity Einstein invented to incorporate the three familiar dimensions of space with a fourth dimension, time--was curved, and not flat, as had been assumed? His idea was that mass and energy would warp space-time in some manner yet to be determined. Objects like apples or planets would try to move in straight lines through space-time, but their paths would appear to be bent by a gravitational field because space-time is curved.

With the help of his friend Marcel Grossmann, Einstein studied the theory of curved spaces and surfaces that had been developed by Bernhard Riemann as a piece of abstract mathematics, without any thought that it would be relevant to the real world. In 1913, Einstein and Grossmann wrote a paper in which they put forward the idea that what we think of as gravitational forces are just an expression of the fact that space-time is curved. However, because of a mistake by Einstein (who was quite human and fallible), they weren't able to find the equations that related the curvature of space-time to the mass and energy in it.

Einstein continued to work on the problem in Berlin, undisturbed by domestic matters and largely unaffected by the war, until he finally found the right equations, in November 1915. Einstein had discussed his ideas with the mathematician David Hilbert during a visit to the University of Gottingen in the summer of 1915, and Hilbert independently found the same equations a few days before Einstein. Nevertheless, as Hilbert admitted, the credit for the new theory belonged to Einstein. It was his idea to relate gravity to the warping of space-time. It is a tribute to the civilized state of Germany in this period that such scientific discussions and exchanges could go on undisturbed even in wartime. What a contrast to 20 years later!

The new theory of curved space-time was called general relativity to distinguish it from the original theory without gravity, which was now known as special relativity. It was confirmed in spectacular fashion in 1919, when a British expedition to West Africa observed a slight shift in the position of stars near the sun during an eclipse. Their light, as Einstein had predicted, was bent as it passed the sun. Here was direct evidence that space and time are warped, the greatest change in our perception of the arena in which we live since Euclid wrote his Elements about 300 B.C.

Einstein's general theory of relativity transformed space and time from a passive background in which events take place to active participants in the dynamics of the cosmos. This led to a great problem that is still at the forefront of physics at the end of the 20th century. The universe is full of matter, and matter warps space-time so that bodies fall together. Einstein found that his equations didn't have a solution that described a universe that was unchanging in time. Rather than give up a static and everlasting universe, which he and most other people believed in at that time, he fudged the equations by adding a term called the cosmological constant, which warped space-time the other way so that bodies move apart. The repulsive effect of the cosmological constant would balance the attractive effect of matter and allow for a universe that lasts for all time.

This turned out to be one of the great missed opportunities of theoretical physics. If Einstein had stuck with his original equations, he could have predicted that the universe must be either expanding or contracting. As it was, the possibility of a time-dependent universe wasn't taken seriously until observations were made in the 1920s with the 100-in. telescope on Mount Wilson. These revealed that the farther other galaxies are from us, the faster they are moving away. In other words, the universe is expanding and the distance between any two galaxies is steadily increasing with time. Einstein later called the cosmological constant the greatest mistake of his life

General relativity completely changed the discussion of the origin and fate of the universe. A static universe could have existed forever or could have been created in its present form at some time in the past. On the other hand, if galaxies are moving apart today, they must have been closer together in the past. About 15 billion years ago, they would all have been on top of one another and their density would have been infinite. According to the general theory, this Big Bang was the beginning of the universe and of time itself. So maybe Einstein deserves to be the person of a longer period than just the past 100 years.

General relativity also predicts that time comes to a stop inside black holes, regions of space-time that are so warped that light cannot escape them. But both the beginning and the end of time are places where the equations of general relativity fall apart. Thus the theory cannot predict what should emerge from the Big Bang. Some see this as an indication of God's freedom to start the universe off any way God wanted. Others (myself included) feel that the beginning of the universe should be governed by the same laws that hold at all other times. We have made some progress toward this goal, but we don't yet have a complete understanding of the origin of the universe.

The reason general relativity broke down at the Big Bang was that it was not compatible with quantum theory, the other great conceptual revolution of the early 20th century. The first step toward quantum theory came in 1900, when Max Planck, working in Berlin, discovered that the radiation from a body that was glowing red hot could be explained if light came only in packets of a certain size, called quanta. It was as if radiation were packaged like sugar; you cannot buy an arbitrary amount of loose sugar in a supermarket but can only buy it in 1-lb. bags. In one of his groundbreaking papers written in 1905, when he was still at the patent office, Einstein showed that Planck's quantum hypothesis could explain what is called the photoelectric effect, the way certain metals give off electrons when light falls on them. This is the basis of modern light detectors and television cameras, and it was for this work that Einstein was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Einstein continued to work on the quantum idea into the 1920s but was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrodinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. No longer did tiny particles have a definite position and speed. On the contrary, the more accurately you determined the particle's position, the less accurately you could determine its speed, and vice versa.

Einstein was horrified by this random, unpredictable element in the basic laws and never fully accepted quantum mechanics. His feelings were expressed in his famous God-does-not-play-dice dictum. Most other scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations and because they seemed to explain a whole range of previously unaccounted-for phenomena. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century.

When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, Einstein left the country and renounced his German citizenship. He spent the last 22 years of his life at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. The Nazis launched a campaign against "Jewish science" and the many German scientists who were Jews (their exodus is part of the reason Germany was not able to build an atom bomb). Einstein and relativity were principal targets for this campaign. When told of publication of the book One Hundred Authors Against Einstein, he replied, Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough.

After World War II, he urged the Allies to set up a world government to control the atom bomb. He was offered the presidency of the new state of Israel in 1952 but turned it down. "Politics is for the moment," he once wrote, "while...an equation is for eternity." The equations of general relativity are his best epitaph and memorial. They should last as long as the universe.

The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological--technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.

Professor Hawking, author of "A Brief History of Time," occupies the Cambridge mathematics chair once held by Isaac Newton.

END

A Brief History of Relativity

What is it? How does it work? Why does it change everything? An easy primer by the world's most famous living physicist

BY STEPHEN HAWKING

Toward the end of the 19th century scientists believed they were close to a complete description of the universe. They imagined that space was filled everywhere by a continuous medium called the ether. Light rays and radio signals were waves in this ether just as sound is pressure waves in air. All that was needed to complete the theory was careful measurements of the elastic properties of the ether; once they had those nailed down, everything else would fall into place.

Soon, however, discrepancies with the idea of an all-pervading ether began to appear. You would expect light to travel at a fixed speed through the ether. So if you were traveling in the same direction as the light, you would expect that its speed would appear to be lower, and if you were traveling in the opposite direction to the light, that its speed would appear to be higher. Yet a series of experiments failed to find any evidence for differences in speed due to motion through the ether.

The most careful and accurate of these experiments was carried out by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at the Case Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1887. They compared the speed of light in two beams at right angles to each other. As the earth rotates on its axis and orbits the sun, they reasoned, it will move through the ether, and the speed of light in these two beams should diverge. But Michelson and Morley found no daily or yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you were moving.

The Irish physicist George FitzGerald and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz were the first to suggest that bodies moving through the ether would contract and that clocks would slow. This shrinking and slowing would be such that everyone would measure the same speed for light no matter how they were moving with respect to the ether, which FitzGerald and Lorentz regarded as a real substance.

But it was a young clerk named Albert Einstein, working in the Swiss Patent Office in Bern, who cut through the ether and solved the speed-of-light problem once and for all. In June 1905 he wrote one of three papers that would establish him as one of the world's leading scientists--and in the process start two conceptual revolutions that changed our understanding of time, space and reality.

In that 1905 paper, Einstein pointed out that because you could not detect whether or not you were moving through the ether, the whole notion of an ether was redundant. Instead, Einstein started from the postulate that the laws of science should appear the same to all freely moving observers. In particular, observers should all measure the same speed for light, no matter how they were moving.

This required abandoning the idea that there is a universal quantity called time that all clocks measure. Instead, everyone would have his own personal time. The clocks of two people would agree if they were at rest with respect to each other but not if they were moving. This has been confirmed by a number of experiments, including one in which an extremely accurate timepiece was flown around the world and then compared with one that had stayed in place. If you wanted to live longer, you could keep flying to the east so the speed of the plane added to the earth's rotation. However, the tiny fraction of a second you gained would be more than offset by eating airline meals.

Einstein's postulate that the laws of nature should appear the same to all freely moving observers was the foundation of the theory of relativity, so called because it implies that only relative motion is important. Its beauty and simplicity were convincing to many scientists and philosophers. But there remained a lot of opposition. Einstein had overthrown two of the Absolutes (with a capital A) of 19th century science: Absolute Rest as represented by the ether, and Absolute or Universal Time that all clocks would measure. Did this imply, people asked, that there were no absolute moral standards, that everything was relative?

This unease continued through the 1920s and '30s. When Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921, the citation was for important--but by Einstein's standards comparatively minor--work also carried out in 1905. There was no mention of relativity, which was considered too controversial. I still get two or three letters a week telling me Einstein was wrong. Nevertheless, the theory of relativity is now completely accepted by the scientific community, and its predictions have been verified in countless applications.

A very important consequence of relativity is the relation between mass and energy. Einstein's postulate that the speed of light should appear the same to everyone implied that nothing could be moving faster than light. What happens is that as energy is used to accelerate a particle or a spaceship, the object's mass increases, making it harder to accelerate any more. To accelerate the particle to the speed of light is impossible because it would take an infinite amount of energy. The equivalence of mass and energy is summed up in Einstein's famous equation E=mc2, probably the only physics equation to have recognition on the street.

Among the consequences of this law is that if the nucleus of a uranium atom fissions (splits) into two nuclei with slightly less total mass, a tremendous amount of energy is released. In 1939, with World War II looming, a group of scientists who realized the implications of this persuaded Einstein to overcome his pacifist scruples and write a letter to President Roosevelt urging the U.S. to start a program of nuclear research. This led to the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb that exploded over Hiroshima in 1945. Some people blame the atom bomb on Einstein because he discovered the relation between mass and energy. But that's like blaming Newton for the gravity that causes airplanes to crash. Einstein took no part in the Manhattan Project and was horrified by the explosion.

Although the theory of relativity fit well with the laws that govern electricity and magnetism, it wasn't compatible with Newton's law of gravity. This law said that if you changed the distribution of matter in one region of space, the change in the gravitational field would be felt instantaneously everywhere else in the universe. Not only would this mean you could send signals faster than light (something that was forbidden by relativity), but it also required the Absolute or Universal Time that relativity had abolished in favor of personal or relativistic time.

Einstein was aware of this difficulty in 1907, while he was still at the patent office in Bern, but didn't begin to think seriously about the problem until he was at the German University in Prague in 1911. He realized that there is a close relationship between acceleration and a gravitational field. Someone in a closed box cannot tell whether he is sitting at rest in the earth's gravitational field or being accelerated by a rocket in free space. (This being before the age of Star Trek, Einstein thought of people in elevators rather than spaceships. But you cannot accelerate or fall freely very far in an elevator before disaster strikes.)

If the earth were flat, one could equally well say that the apple fell on Newton's head because of gravity or that Newton's head hit the apple because he and the surface of the earth were accelerating upward. This equivalence between acceleration and gravity didn't seem to work for a round earth, however; people on the other side of the world would have to be accelerating in the opposite direction but staying at a constant distance from us.

On his return to Zurich in 1912 Einstein had a brainstorm. He realized that the equivalence of gravity and acceleration could work if there was some give-and-take in the geometry of reality. What if space-time--an entity Einstein invented to incorporate the three familiar dimensions of space with a fourth dimension, time--was curved, and not flat, as had been assumed? His idea was that mass and energy would warp space-time in some manner yet to be determined. Objects like apples or planets would try to move in straight lines through space-time, but their paths would appear to be bent by a gravitational field because space-time is curved.

With the help of his friend Marcel Grossmann, Einstein studied the theory of curved spaces and surfaces that had been developed by Bernhard Riemann as a piece of abstract mathematics, without any thought that it would be relevant to the real world. In 1913, Einstein and Grossmann wrote a paper in which they put forward the idea that what we think of as gravitational forces are just an expression of the fact that space-time is curved. However, because of a mistake by Einstein (who was quite human and fallible), they weren't able to find the equations that related the curvature of space-time to the mass and energy in it.

Einstein continued to work on the problem in Berlin, undisturbed by domestic matters and largely unaffected by the war, until he finally found the right equations, in November 1915. Einstein had discussed his ideas with the mathematician David Hilbert during a visit to the University of Gottingen in the summer of 1915, and Hilbert independently found the same equations a few days before Einstein. Nevertheless, as Hilbert admitted, the credit for the new theory belonged to Einstein. It was his idea to relate gravity to the warping of space-time. It is a tribute to the civilized state of Germany in this period that such scientific discussions and exchanges could go on undisturbed even in wartime. What a contrast to 20 years later!

The new theory of curved space-time was called general relativity to distinguish it from the original theory without gravity, which was now known as special relativity. It was confirmed in spectacular fashion in 1919, when a British expedition to West Africa observed a slight shift in the position of stars near the sun during an eclipse. Their light, as Einstein had predicted, was bent as it passed the sun. Here was direct evidence that space and time are warped, the greatest change in our perception of the arena in which we live since Euclid wrote his Elements about 300 B.C.

Einstein's general theory of relativity transformed space and time from a passive background in which events take place to active participants in the dynamics of the cosmos. This led to a great problem that is still at the forefront of physics at the end of the 20th century. The universe is full of matter, and matter warps space-time so that bodies fall together. Einstein found that his equations didn't have a solution that described a universe that was unchanging in time. Rather than give up a static and everlasting universe, which he and most other people believed in at that time, he fudged the equations by adding a term called the cosmological constant, which warped space-time the other way so that bodies move apart. The repulsive effect of the cosmological constant would balance the attractive effect of matter and allow for a universe that lasts for all time.

This turned out to be one of the great missed opportunities of theoretical physics. If Einstein had stuck with his original equations, he could have predicted that the universe must be either expanding or contracting. As it was, the possibility of a time-dependent universe wasn't taken seriously until observations were made in the 1920s with the 100-in. telescope on Mount Wilson. These revealed that the farther other galaxies are from us, the faster they are moving away. In other words, the universe is expanding and the distance between any two galaxies is steadily increasing with time. Einstein later called the cosmological constant the greatest mistake of his life

General relativity completely changed the discussion of the origin and fate of the universe. A static universe could have existed forever or could have been created in its present form at some time in the past. On the other hand, if galaxies are moving apart today, they must have been closer together in the past. About 15 billion years ago, they would all have been on top of one another and their density would have been infinite. According to the general theory, this Big Bang was the beginning of the universe and of time itself. So maybe Einstein deserves to be the person of a longer period than just the past 100 years.

General relativity also predicts that time comes to a stop inside black holes, regions of space-time that are so warped that light cannot escape them. But both the beginning and the end of time are places where the equations of general relativity fall apart. Thus the theory cannot predict what should emerge from the Big Bang. Some see this as an indication of God's freedom to start the universe off any way God wanted. Others (myself included) feel that the beginning of the universe should be governed by the same laws that hold at all other times. We have made some progress toward this goal, but we don't yet have a complete understanding of the origin of the universe.

The reason general relativity broke down at the Big Bang was that it was not compatible with quantum theory, the other great conceptual revolution of the early 20th century. The first step toward quantum theory came in 1900, when Max Planck, working in Berlin, discovered that the radiation from a body that was glowing red hot could be explained if light came only in packets of a certain size, called quanta. It was as if radiation were packaged like sugar; you cannot buy an arbitrary amount of loose sugar in a supermarket but can only buy it in 1-lb. bags. In one of his groundbreaking papers written in 1905, when he was still at the patent office, Einstein showed that Planck's quantum hypothesis could explain what is called the photoelectric effect, the way certain metals give off electrons when light falls on them. This is the basis of modern light detectors and television cameras, and it was for this work that Einstein was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Einstein continued to work on the quantum idea into the 1920s but was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrodinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. No longer did tiny particles have a definite position and speed. On the contrary, the more accurately you determined the particle's position, the less accurately you could determine its speed, and vice versa.

Einstein was horrified by this random, unpredictable element in the basic laws and never fully accepted quantum mechanics. His feelings were expressed in his famous God-does-not-play-dice dictum. Most other scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations and because they seemed to explain a whole range of previously unaccounted-for phenomena. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century.

When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, Einstein left the country and renounced his German citizenship. He spent the last 22 years of his life at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. The Nazis launched a campaign against "Jewish science" and the many German scientists who were Jews (their exodus is part of the reason Germany was not able to build an atom bomb). Einstein and relativity were principal targets for this campaign. When told of publication of the book One Hundred Authors Against Einstein, he replied, Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough.

After World War II, he urged the Allies to set up a world government to control the atom bomb. He was offered the presidency of the new state of Israel in 1952 but turned it down. "Politics is for the moment," he once wrote, "while...an equation is for eternity." The equations of general relativity are his best epitaph and memorial. They should last as long as the universe.

The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological--technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.

Professor Hawking, author of "A Brief History of Time," occupies the Cambridge mathematics chair once held by Isaac Newton.

END

A Brief History of Relativity

What is it? How does it work? Why does it change everything? An easy primer by the world's most famous living physicist

BY STEPHEN HAWKING

Toward the end of the 19th century scientists believed they were close to a complete description of the universe. They imagined that space was filled everywhere by a continuous medium called the ether. Light rays and radio signals were waves in this ether just as sound is pressure waves in air. All that was needed to complete the theory was careful measurements of the elastic properties of the ether; once they had those nailed down, everything else would fall into place.

Soon, however, discrepancies with the idea of an all-pervading ether began to appear. You would expect light to travel at a fixed speed through the ether. So if you were traveling in the same direction as the light, you would expect that its speed would appear to be lower, and if you were traveling in the opposite direction to the light, that its speed would appear to be higher. Yet a series of experiments failed to find any evidence for differences in speed due to motion through the ether.

The most careful and accurate of these experiments was carried out by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at the Case Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1887. They compared the speed of light in two beams at right angles to each other. As the earth rotates on its axis and orbits the sun, they reasoned, it will move through the ether, and the speed of light in these two beams should diverge. But Michelson and Morley found no daily or yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you were moving.

The Irish physicist George FitzGerald and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz were the first to suggest that bodies moving through the ether would contract and that clocks would slow. This shrinking and slowing would be such that everyone would measure the same speed for light no matter how they were moving with respect to the ether, which FitzGerald and Lorentz regarded as a real substance.

But it was a young clerk named Albert Einstein, working in the Swiss Patent Office in Bern, who cut through the ether and solved the speed-of-light problem once and for all. In June 1905 he wrote one of three papers that would establish him as one of the world's leading scientists--and in the process start two conceptual revolutions that changed our understanding of time, space and reality.

In that 1905 paper, Einstein pointed out that because you could not detect whether or not you were moving through the ether, the whole notion of an ether was redundant. Instead, Einstein started from the postulate that the laws of science should appear the same to all freely moving observers. In particular, observers should all measure the same speed for light, no matter how they were moving.

This required abandoning the idea that there is a universal quantity called time that all clocks measure. Instead, everyone would have his own personal time. The clocks of two people would agree if they were at rest with respect to each other but not if they were moving. This has been confirmed by a number of experiments, including one in which an extremely accurate timepiece was flown around the world and then compared with one that had stayed in place. If you wanted to live longer, you could keep flying to the east so the speed of the plane added to the earth's rotation. However, the tiny fraction of a second you gained would be more than offset by eating airline meals.

Einstein's postulate that the laws of nature should appear the same to all freely moving observers was the foundation of the theory of relativity, so called because it implies that only relative motion is important. Its beauty and simplicity were convincing to many scientists and philosophers. But there remained a lot of opposition. Einstein had overthrown two of the Absolutes (with a capital A) of 19th century science: Absolute Rest as represented by the ether, and Absolute or Universal Time that all clocks would measure. Did this imply, people asked, that there were no absolute moral standards, that everything was relative?

This unease continued through the 1920s and '30s. When Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921, the citation was for important--but by Einstein's standards comparatively minor--work also carried out in 1905. There was no mention of relativity, which was considered too controversial. I still get two or three letters a week telling me Einstein was wrong. Nevertheless, the theory of relativity is now completely accepted by the scientific community, and its predictions have been verified in countless applications.

A very important consequence of relativity is the relation between mass and energy. Einstein's postulate that the speed of light should appear the same to everyone implied that nothing could be moving faster than light. What happens is that as energy is used to accelerate a particle or a spaceship, the object's mass increases, making it harder to accelerate any more. To accelerate the particle to the speed of light is impossible because it would take an infinite amount of energy. The equivalence of mass and energy is summed up in Einstein's famous equation E=mc2, probably the only physics equation to have recognition on the street.

Among the consequences of this law is that if the nucleus of a uranium atom fissions (splits) into two nuclei with slightly less total mass, a tremendous amount of energy is released. In 1939, with World War II looming, a group of scientists who realized the implications of this persuaded Einstein to overcome his pacifist scruples and write a letter to President Roosevelt urging the U.S. to start a program of nuclear research. This led to the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb that exploded over Hiroshima in 1945. Some people blame the atom bomb on Einstein because he discovered the relation between mass and energy. But that's like blaming Newton for the gravity that causes airplanes to crash. Einstein took no part in the Manhattan Project and was horrified by the explosion.

Although the theory of relativity fit well with the laws that govern electricity and magnetism, it wasn't compatible with Newton's law of gravity. This law said that if you changed the distribution of matter in one region of space, the change in the gravitational field would be felt instantaneously everywhere else in the universe. Not only would this mean you could send signals faster than light (something that was forbidden by relativity), but it also required the Absolute or Universal Time that relativity had abolished in favor of personal or relativistic time.

Einstein was aware of this difficulty in 1907, while he was still at the patent office in Bern, but didn't begin to think seriously about the problem until he was at the German University in Prague in 1911. He realized that there is a close relationship between acceleration and a gravitational field. Someone in a closed box cannot tell whether he is sitting at rest in the earth's gravitational field or being accelerated by a rocket in free space. (This being before the age of Star Trek, Einstein thought of people in elevators rather than spaceships. But you cannot accelerate or fall freely very far in an elevator before disaster strikes.)

If the earth were flat, one could equally well say that the apple fell on Newton's head because of gravity or that Newton's head hit the apple because he and the surface of the earth were accelerating upward. This equivalence between acceleration and gravity didn't seem to work for a round earth, however; people on the other side of the world would have to be accelerating in the opposite direction but staying at a constant distance from us.

On his return to Zurich in 1912 Einstein had a brainstorm. He realized that the equivalence of gravity and acceleration could work if there was some give-and-take in the geometry of reality. What if space-time--an entity Einstein invented to incorporate the three familiar dimensions of space with a fourth dimension, time--was curved, and not flat, as had been assumed? His idea was that mass and energy would warp space-time in some manner yet to be determined. Objects like apples or planets would try to move in straight lines through space-time, but their paths would appear to be bent by a gravitational field because space-time is curved.

With the help of his friend Marcel Grossmann, Einstein studied the theory of curved spaces and surfaces that had been developed by Bernhard Riemann as a piece of abstract mathematics, without any thought that it would be relevant to the real world. In 1913, Einstein and Grossmann wrote a paper in which they put forward the idea that what we think of as gravitational forces are just an expression of the fact that space-time is curved. However, because of a mistake by Einstein (who was quite human and fallible), they weren't able to find the equations that related the curvature of space-time to the mass and energy in it.

Einstein continued to work on the problem in Berlin, undisturbed by domestic matters and largely unaffected by the war, until he finally found the right equations, in November 1915. Einstein had discussed his ideas with the mathematician David Hilbert during a visit to the University of Gottingen in the summer of 1915, and Hilbert independently found the same equations a few days before Einstein. Nevertheless, as Hilbert admitted, the credit for the new theory belonged to Einstein. It was his idea to relate gravity to the warping of space-time. It is a tribute to the civilized state of Germany in this period that such scientific discussions and exchanges could go on undisturbed even in wartime. What a contrast to 20 years later!

The new theory of curved space-time was called general relativity to distinguish it from the original theory without gravity, which was now known as special relativity. It was confirmed in spectacular fashion in 1919, when a British expedition to West Africa observed a slight shift in the position of stars near the sun during an eclipse. Their light, as Einstein had predicted, was bent as it passed the sun. Here was direct evidence that space and time are warped, the greatest change in our perception of the arena in which we live since Euclid wrote his Elements about 300 B.C.

Einstein's general theory of relativity transformed space and time from a passive background in which events take place to active participants in the dynamics of the cosmos. This led to a great problem that is still at the forefront of physics at the end of the 20th century. The universe is full of matter, and matter warps space-time so that bodies fall together. Einstein found that his equations didn't have a solution that described a universe that was unchanging in time. Rather than give up a static and everlasting universe, which he and most other people believed in at that time, he fudged the equations by adding a term called the cosmological constant, which warped space-time the other way so that bodies move apart. The repulsive effect of the cosmological constant would balance the attractive effect of matter and allow for a universe that lasts for all time.

This turned out to be one of the great missed opportunities of theoretical physics. If Einstein had stuck with his original equations, he could have predicted that the universe must be either expanding or contracting. As it was, the possibility of a time-dependent universe wasn't taken seriously until observations were made in the 1920s with the 100-in. telescope on Mount Wilson. These revealed that the farther other galaxies are from us, the faster they are moving away. In other words, the universe is expanding and the distance between any two galaxies is steadily increasing with time. Einstein later called the cosmological constant the greatest mistake of his life

General relativity completely changed the discussion of the origin and fate of the universe. A static universe could have existed forever or could have been created in its present form at some time in the past. On the other hand, if galaxies are moving apart today, they must have been closer together in the past. About 15 billion years ago, they would all have been on top of one another and their density would have been infinite. According to the general theory, this Big Bang was the beginning of the universe and of time itself. So maybe Einstein deserves to be the person of a longer period than just the past 100 years.

General relativity also predicts that time comes to a stop inside black holes, regions of space-time that are so warped that light cannot escape them. But both the beginning and the end of time are places where the equations of general relativity fall apart. Thus the theory cannot predict what should emerge from the Big Bang. Some see this as an indication of God's freedom to start the universe off any way God wanted. Others (myself included) feel that the beginning of the universe should be governed by the same laws that hold at all other times. We have made some progress toward this goal, but we don't yet have a complete understanding of the origin of the universe.

The reason general relativity broke down at the Big Bang was that it was not compatible with quantum theory, the other great conceptual revolution of the early 20th century. The first step toward quantum theory came in 1900, when Max Planck, working in Berlin, discovered that the radiation from a body that was glowing red hot could be explained if light came only in packets of a certain size, called quanta. It was as if radiation were packaged like sugar; you cannot buy an arbitrary amount of loose sugar in a supermarket but can only buy it in 1-lb. bags. In one of his groundbreaking papers written in 1905, when he was still at the patent office, Einstein showed that Planck's quantum hypothesis could explain what is called the photoelectric effect, the way certain metals give off electrons when light falls on them. This is the basis of modern light detectors and television cameras, and it was for this work that Einstein was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Einstein continued to work on the quantum idea into the 1920s but was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrodinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. No longer did tiny particles have a definite position and speed. On the contrary, the more accurately you determined the particle's position, the less accurately you could determine its speed, and vice versa.

Einstein was horrified by this random, unpredictable element in the basic laws and never fully accepted quantum mechanics. His feelings were expressed in his famous God-does-not-play-dice dictum. Most other scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations and because they seemed to explain a whole range of previously unaccounted-for phenomena. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century.

When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, Einstein left the country and renounced his German citizenship. He spent the last 22 years of his life at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. The Nazis launched a campaign against "Jewish science" and the many German scientists who were Jews (their exodus is part of the reason Germany was not able to build an atom bomb). Einstein and relativity were principal targets for this campaign. When told of publication of the book One Hundred Authors Against Einstein, he replied, Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough.

After World War II, he urged the Allies to set up a world government to control the atom bomb. He was offered the presidency of the new state of Israel in 1952 but turned it down. "Politics is for the moment," he once wrote, "while...an equation is for eternity." The equations of general relativity are his best epitaph and memorial. They should last as long as the universe.

The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological--technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.

Professor Hawking, author of "A Brief History of Time," occupies the Cambridge mathematics chair once held by Isaac Newton.

END

A Brief History of Relativity

What is it? How does it work? Why does it change everything? An easy primer by the world's most famous living physicist

BY STEPHEN HAWKING

Toward the end of the 19th century scientists believed they were close to a complete description of the universe. They imagined that space was filled everywhere by a continuous medium called the ether. Light rays and radio signals were waves in this ether just as sound is pressure waves in air. All that was needed to complete the theory was careful measurements of the elastic properties of the ether; once they had those nailed down, everything else would fall into place.

Soon, however, discrepancies with the idea of an all-pervading ether began to appear. You would expect light to travel at a fixed speed through the ether. So if you were traveling in the same direction as the light, you would expect that its speed would appear to be lower, and if you were traveling in the opposite direction to the light, that its speed would appear to be higher. Yet a series of experiments failed to find any evidence for differences in speed due to motion through the ether.

The most careful and accurate of these experiments was carried out by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at the Case Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1887. They compared the speed of light in two beams at right angles to each other. As the earth rotates on its axis and orbits the sun, they reasoned, it will move through the ether, and the speed of light in these two beams should diverge. But Michelson and Morley found no daily or yearly differences between the two beams of light. It was as if light always traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you were moving.

The Irish physicist George FitzGerald and the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz were the first to suggest that bodies moving through the ether would contract and that clocks would slow. This shrinking and slowing would be such that everyone would measure the same speed for light no matter how they were moving with respect to the ether, which FitzGerald and Lorentz regarded as a real substance.

But it was a young clerk named Albert Einstein, working in the Swiss Patent Office in Bern, who cut through the ether and solved the speed-of-light problem once and for all. In June 1905 he wrote one of three papers that would establish him as one of the world's leading scientists--and in the process start two conceptual revolutions that changed our understanding of time, space and reality.

In that 1905 paper, Einstein pointed out that because you could not detect whether or not you were moving through the ether, the whole notion of an ether was redundant. Instead, Einstein started from the postulate that the laws of science should appear the same to all freely moving observers. In particular, observers should all measure the same speed for light, no matter how they were moving.

This required abandoning the idea that there is a universal quantity called time that all clocks measure. Instead, everyone would have his own personal time. The clocks of two people would agree if they were at rest with respect to each other but not if they were moving. This has been confirmed by a number of experiments, including one in which an extremely accurate timepiece was flown around the world and then compared with one that had stayed in place. If you wanted to live longer, you could keep flying to the east so the speed of the plane added to the earth's rotation. However, the tiny fraction of a second you gained would be more than offset by eating airline meals.

Einstein's postulate that the laws of nature should appear the same to all freely moving observers was the foundation of the theory of relativity, so called because it implies that only relative motion is important. Its beauty and simplicity were convincing to many scientists and philosophers. But there remained a lot of opposition. Einstein had overthrown two of the Absolutes (with a capital A) of 19th century science: Absolute Rest as represented by the ether, and Absolute or Universal Time that all clocks would measure. Did this imply, people asked, that there were no absolute moral standards, that everything was relative?

This unease continued through the 1920s and '30s. When Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921, the citation was for important--but by Einstein's standards comparatively minor--work also carried out in 1905. There was no mention of relativity, which was considered too controversial. I still get two or three letters a week telling me Einstein was wrong. Nevertheless, the theory of relativity is now completely accepted by the scientific community, and its predictions have been verified in countless applications.

A very important consequence of relativity is the relation between mass and energy. Einstein's postulate that the speed of light should appear the same to everyone implied that nothing could be moving faster than light. What happens is that as energy is used to accelerate a particle or a spaceship, the object's mass increases, making it harder to accelerate any more. To accelerate the particle to the speed of light is impossible because it would take an infinite amount of energy. The equivalence of mass and energy is summed up in Einstein's famous equation E=mc2, probably the only physics equation to have recognition on the street.

Among the consequences of this law is that if the nucleus of a uranium atom fissions (splits) into two nuclei with slightly less total mass, a tremendous amount of energy is released. In 1939, with World War II looming, a group of scientists who realized the implications of this persuaded Einstein to overcome his pacifist scruples and write a letter to President Roosevelt urging the U.S. to start a program of nuclear research. This led to the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb that exploded over Hiroshima in 1945. Some people blame the atom bomb on Einstein because he discovered the relation between mass and energy. But that's like blaming Newton for the gravity that causes airplanes to crash. Einstein took no part in the Manhattan Project and was horrified by the explosion.

Although the theory of relativity fit well with the laws that govern electricity and magnetism, it wasn't compatible with Newton's law of gravity. This law said that if you changed the distribution of matter in one region of space, the change in the gravitational field would be felt instantaneously everywhere else in the universe. Not only would this mean you could send signals faster than light (something that was forbidden by relativity), but it also required the Absolute or Universal Time that relativity had abolished in favor of personal or relativistic time.

Einstein was aware of this difficulty in 1907, while he was still at the patent office in Bern, but didn't begin to think seriously about the problem until he was at the German University in Prague in 1911. He realized that there is a close relationship between acceleration and a gravitational field. Someone in a closed box cannot tell whether he is sitting at rest in the earth's gravitational field or being accelerated by a rocket in free space. (This being before the age of Star Trek, Einstein thought of people in elevators rather than spaceships. But you cannot accelerate or fall freely very far in an elevator before disaster strikes.)

If the earth were flat, one could equally well say that the apple fell on Newton's head because of gravity or that Newton's head hit the apple because he and the surface of the earth were accelerating upward. This equivalence between acceleration and gravity didn't seem to work for a round earth, however; people on the other side of the world would have to be accelerating in the opposite direction but staying at a constant distance from us.

On his return to Zurich in 1912 Einstein had a brainstorm. He realized that the equivalence of gravity and acceleration could work if there was some give-and-take in the geometry of reality. What if space-time--an entity Einstein invented to incorporate the three familiar dimensions of space with a fourth dimension, time--was curved, and not flat, as had been assumed? His idea was that mass and energy would warp space-time in some manner yet to be determined. Objects like apples or planets would try to move in straight lines through space-time, but their paths would appear to be bent by a gravitational field because space-time is curved.

With the help of his friend Marcel Grossmann, Einstein studied the theory of curved spaces and surfaces that had been developed by Bernhard Riemann as a piece of abstract mathematics, without any thought that it would be relevant to the real world. In 1913, Einstein and Grossmann wrote a paper in which they put forward the idea that what we think of as gravitational forces are just an expression of the fact that space-time is curved. However, because of a mistake by Einstein (who was quite human and fallible), they weren't able to find the equations that related the curvature of space-time to the mass and energy in it.

Einstein continued to work on the problem in Berlin, undisturbed by domestic matters and largely unaffected by the war, until he finally found the right equations, in November 1915. Einstein had discussed his ideas with the mathematician David Hilbert during a visit to the University of Gottingen in the summer of 1915, and Hilbert independently found the same equations a few days before Einstein. Nevertheless, as Hilbert admitted, the credit for the new theory belonged to Einstein. It was his idea to relate gravity to the warping of space-time. It is a tribute to the civilized state of Germany in this period that such scientific discussions and exchanges could go on undisturbed even in wartime. What a contrast to 20 years later!

The new theory of curved space-time was called general relativity to distinguish it from the original theory without gravity, which was now known as special relativity. It was confirmed in spectacular fashion in 1919, when a British expedition to West Africa observed a slight shift in the position of stars near the sun during an eclipse. Their light, as Einstein had predicted, was bent as it passed the sun. Here was direct evidence that space and time are warped, the greatest change in our perception of the arena in which we live since Euclid wrote his Elements about 300 B.C.

Einstein's general theory of relativity transformed space and time from a passive background in which events take place to active participants in the dynamics of the cosmos. This led to a great problem that is still at the forefront of physics at the end of the 20th century. The universe is full of matter, and matter warps space-time so that bodies fall together. Einstein found that his equations didn't have a solution that described a universe that was unchanging in time. Rather than give up a static and everlasting universe, which he and most other people believed in at that time, he fudged the equations by adding a term called the cosmological constant, which warped space-time the other way so that bodies move apart. The repulsive effect of the cosmological constant would balance the attractive effect of matter and allow for a universe that lasts for all time.

This turned out to be one of the great missed opportunities of theoretical physics. If Einstein had stuck with his original equations, he could have predicted that the universe must be either expanding or contracting. As it was, the possibility of a time-dependent universe wasn't taken seriously until observations were made in the 1920s with the 100-in. telescope on Mount Wilson. These revealed that the farther other galaxies are from us, the faster they are moving away. In other words, the universe is expanding and the distance between any two galaxies is steadily increasing with time. Einstein later called the cosmological constant the greatest mistake of his life

General relativity completely changed the discussion of the origin and fate of the universe. A static universe could have existed forever or could have been created in its present form at some time in the past. On the other hand, if galaxies are moving apart today, they must have been closer together in the past. About 15 billion years ago, they would all have been on top of one another and their density would have been infinite. According to the general theory, this Big Bang was the beginning of the universe and of time itself. So maybe Einstein deserves to be the person of a longer period than just the past 100 years.

General relativity also predicts that time comes to a stop inside black holes, regions of space-time that are so warped that light cannot escape them. But both the beginning and the end of time are places where the equations of general relativity fall apart. Thus the theory cannot predict what should emerge from the Big Bang. Some see this as an indication of God's freedom to start the universe off any way God wanted. Others (myself included) feel that the beginning of the universe should be governed by the same laws that hold at all other times. We have made some progress toward this goal, but we don't yet have a complete understanding of the origin of the universe.

The reason general relativity broke down at the Big Bang was that it was not compatible with quantum theory, the other great conceptual revolution of the early 20th century. The first step toward quantum theory came in 1900, when Max Planck, working in Berlin, discovered that the radiation from a body that was glowing red hot could be explained if light came only in packets of a certain size, called quanta. It was as if radiation were packaged like sugar; you cannot buy an arbitrary amount of loose sugar in a supermarket but can only buy it in 1-lb. bags. In one of his groundbreaking papers written in 1905, when he was still at the patent office, Einstein showed that Planck's quantum hypothesis could explain what is called the photoelectric effect, the way certain metals give off electrons when light falls on them. This is the basis of modern light detectors and television cameras, and it was for this work that Einstein was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Einstein continued to work on the quantum idea into the 1920s but was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrodinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. No longer did tiny particles have a definite position and speed. On the contrary, the more accurately you determined the particle's position, the less accurately you could determine its speed, and vice versa.

Einstein was horrified by this random, unpredictable element in the basic laws and never fully accepted quantum mechanics. His feelings were expressed in his famous God-does-not-play-dice dictum. Most other scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations and because they seemed to explain a whole range of previously unaccounted-for phenomena. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century.

When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, Einstein left the country and renounced his German citizenship. He spent the last 22 years of his life at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. The Nazis launched a campaign against "Jewish science" and the many German scientists who were Jews (their exodus is part of the reason Germany was not able to build an atom bomb). Einstein and relativity were principal targets for this campaign. When told of publication of the book One Hundred Authors Against Einstein, he replied, Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough.

After World War II, he urged the Allies to set up a world government to control the atom bomb. He was offered the presidency of the new state of Israel in 1952 but turned it down. "Politics is for the moment," he once wrote, "while...an equation is for eternity." The equations of general relativity are his best epitaph and memorial. They should last as long as the universe.

The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological--technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.

Professor Hawking, author of "A Brief History of Time," occupies the Cambridge mathematics chair once held by Isaac Newton.

END